NavigationHome Where is Gornal Local History Family History Gallery Old News We Need... Dialect 'its a loff aye it' Other Stuff Links About Us Contact Us
Landmarks ~ Churches ~ Pubs ~ Shops ~ Amenities ~ Dwellings ~ Events ~ Schools ~ Sports
Industrial ~ Transport ~ Families
~ Families and People ~
John Turton Fereday ~ John Lloyd Gibbons ~ George Kirby ~ James Yates Rooker ~ John Johnson Shaw
Theodosius Theodosius ~ Ruiton Travellers ~ Singing Miners
James Yates Rooker
Vicar of St. James, 1848 - 1887
James Yates Rooker was born on 27th February 1812, the Son of Able Rooker's first marriage with Susannah Brevitt who were married in 1811, Able Rooker was a Surgeon from Darleston.
J.Y.R. was Curate of Hathersage, Derbyshire until 1847, he then moved to St. James's, Lower Gornal in 1848, he served the community for the rest of his life.
A Murderous Outrage in Lower Gornal
The Attempted Murder of James Yates Rooker, Vicar of Lower Gornal.
It was Friday, 8th of August 1879, around ten o'clock in the morning in a remote Black Country village,
Lower Gornal was a small close-knit community of miners and nailers in South Staffordshire, a cluster of shops situated at the Five Ways or 'Green' as it was known locally, was the central point of the Village and the scene for an outrage that would reverberate around the country.
Charles Harland was seemingly a respectable man, a 46 year old Stone Merchant and Quarry Owner of Ruiton in nearby Upper Gornal, although in recent times he had found himself in a poor financial state.
James Yates Rooker was incumbent of St. James' Church, Lower Gornal
and also a magistrate for the County of Stafford, he often sat on the Bench of Magistrates at Sedgley.
Although on the outside all appeared well between Reverend Rooker and Charles Hartland,
the two gentlemen were friends and Hartland served as leader of the choir at the church
for many years.
Recently Mr. Hartland seemed to be in a very sullen state and had been seen lurking
about the district, quietly threatening harm to both James Rooker and also to
Mr Thomas Gould of Petworth house in Church Street.
Charles Hartland was now a man enraged, he had threatened both the Reverend Rooker
and Thomas Gould in the past.
Hartland was heavily in debt and earlier that very morning, the bailiffs had visited his house in Ruiton with the intent of selling-off furniture to pay off debts owing.
That fateful morning in August, Charles Hartland had been talking to Grocer
Jabez Addenbrooke in Church Street for a few minutes before he continued on
to Mr. Addenbrooke's shop on the Five Ways.
Here unwinds Hartland's wicked plan to wait for the Reverend with intent to confront and harm him.
That morning, the Vicar walked across the road from the Vicarage nearby in
Church Street and went shopping on the Five Ways.
Mrs. Bird, the wife of Benjamin Bird of Ruiton, was visiting her sister
Mrs. Addenbrook at the grocery shop at the time.
Mrs. Adddenbrooke left the shop and Charles Hartland appeared to linger about.
What no one knew was that there was menace in Hartland's eyes and after they had briefly spoken,
the Reverend turned to make his way out of the shop door.
Mrs Bird, aware of what was happening, had left the parlour and rushed into the shop
and tried to assist Reverend Rooker as he staggered out.
At this point other local people had rushed to the scene and the Reverend Rooker was assisted back to the Vicarage just across the road and the doctor was sent for.
A crowd of people had gathered and were shouting after Hartland as he strode along Ruiton Street; "Stop him"; "..he wants hanging"; "he's shot Mr. Rooker" and some of them followed after him.
As Hartland passed by The Chapel House pub about fifty yards along Ruiton Street, someone again shouted "Stop him!" to which Harland calmly replied "I don't want stopping; I'm alright now".
Police Constable Wright, who was in his garden next to the Police Station
in Ruiton, had heard the commotion.
The Constable took him into custody at the Police House, where he arrested him.
Dr. Thomas Walker, who lived at Prospect House in Upper Gornal,
was Medical Officer of Health for the Sedgley Board.
The bullets appeared to be lodged in the Mr. Rooker's head, the reverend gentleman was found to have one bullet which had gone into the roof of his mouth, one above and behind the ear, and a third one near the carotid artery.
Doctor Walker gave little chance for his patient's survival and expected that the wounds he received would likely prove fatal.
During this time Reverend Rooker, although weak and had lost a lot of blood, remained conscious and perfectly sensible.
At the hearing, Solomon Nock, a gardener who had in the past done work for the
Reverend Rooker, said that about twelve months previous to the incident,
he was in 'Mr. Pattersons', The Waggon and Horses public house in Ruiton Street
The night before the shooting, Thursday the 7th of August,
Charles Hartland who had been in his capacity as choir leader at St. James Church,
had visited the Reverend's vicarage in Church Street after the service.
A few days after the shooting, Hartland admitted that the two undischarged
chambers in the revolver were reserved for Reverend Rooker's son-in-law
On Saturday, 10th August, the day after the incident, Charles Hartland was
charged at Bilston Police Court with shooting James Yates Rooker with
intent to murder him.
At the Court the defendant was asked if he had anything to say, he replied "No" and appeared rather nonchalant.
The following week, on the 19th August, Hartland was removed to Sedgley where he would be remanded for trial at Stafford Assises.
Although some had questioned Charles Hartland's state-of-mind at the time of the shooting, he was passed as sane by a prison doctor during his remand in Stafford gaol.
On the 7th of November, at Staffordshire Winter Assises,
Charles Hartland was indicted for the felonious wounding of
Reverend James Yates Rooker with the intent of killing him.
Reverend Rooker had great difficulty attending the trial, but did plead leniency for his once friend, despite having Hartland's bullets still in his head, including one lodged in his brain.
After the trial, a local petition was sent to the Home Secretary to get Hartland's sentence reduced, but this was rejected.
The incident at Lower Gornal was widely reported around the country and the cold-blooded attack on the Vicar caused great outrage.
After a couple of weeks had passed, it was with great relief that the
Vicars health had improved to an extent that he could again be seen in public.
The Reverend Rooker was still in the care of Dr. Walker,
despite rumours that specialist surgeons would be called to attempt to remove
the bullets from his head.
Dr. Walker continued to attend him and the Reverend maintained that the local practitioners were responsible for his miraculous survival and recovery and that he had great faith in them.
On Sunday the 14th of December, 1879 the Reverend Rooker officiated for the
first time at the morning service at St. James' Church and preached
his first sermon since the incident.
The Reverend James Yates Rooker eventually recovered from his injuries
to live on a few years more and continued as Vicar of St. James The Great.
What about the Hartlands?
His father, Joseph Hartland was a builder, and in 1851 the family was
living at Tower Street, Dudley.
Charles Hartland married Elizabeth Wallens from Penn, and they were married at Sedgley All Saints in 1860, they lived on Dudley Road, Upper Gornal in 1861. Census
1864: Bankruptcy Notice, London Gaazette April 19.
In 1871, Hartland was living at the 'Swan Inn', No. 1, Mount Street, Upper Gornal.
What of Charles Hartland?
Not much has been discovered as to what happened to Charles Hartland after his conviction.
His wife Elizabeth was living in Clarence Street, Upper Gornal in 1881, with their children, Charles Henry and daughter Louisa, who was now 17 years old.
In 1863, some years before the above events, The Rev. James Rooker was also in the news when his brother William Yates Rooker, also a clergyman, petitioned for divorce from his American wife Sarah Mapenburgh Rooker, who's drunkeness and affair with Henry Skimpton Newton, a married man, became a local scandal.
DIVORCE OF A CLERYMAN'S WIFE.
At the Divorce Court, on Wednesday, a case was heard in which the Rev. William Yates Rooker, a clergyman of the Church of England, sought a divorce from his wife, on the ground of adultery with Mr. Henry Skimpton Newton, lime burner, of Lower Gornal, Staffordshire. Dr. Deane, Q.C., appeared for the petitioner, and Dr. Stavey Hill, for the respondent, whom the petitioner married in Virginia, in 1842. There have been four children by the marriage. In 1860 the respondent went back to America, but returned in 1862 owing to the war in America. On her return to this country she was received by her husband and friends, but in consequence of her continuance of her habits of intemperance they were again separated, he allowed her a sufficient sum for her maintenance, which was paid to her by his brother, the Rev. James Rooker, incumbent of Lower Gornal, in Staffordshire, he also provided a cottage for her residence, and using all his exertions as a clergyman to reform her habits. In the later part of 1862 she became acquainted with the co-respondent, who was at that time the leader of the choir and superintendent of the Sunday Schools attached to the church of the Rev. James Rooker, at Lower Gornal; and in consequence of the rumours that were circulating through the village, he was deposed by Mr. Rooker; and evidence to prove the adultery was offered. Dr. Hill took objections as to the marriage in Virginia, and they were reserved.
The Derby Mercury, 25 November 1863
At the proceedings, Mary Bates, of Lower Gornal, who used to wash for Mr. Rooker stated that she had witnessed Mr. Newton and Mrs. Rooker alone together and kissing, and on another occasion she had seen them both enter Mrs. Rookers house and the doors were locked.
The adultery was established but there was some uncertainty over whether the marriage in Virginia in 1842 was proved, the case was stood over.
William Yates Rooker, appears to have remarried, he died in 1869.
this aye fur noggin yeds